From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YVb53-0000u8-SH for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:29:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1426058414.1567.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: RFC: detect and manage power cut on MLC NAND From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:20:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <54FEDC42.2060407@dave-tech.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrea Scian , mtd_mailinglist List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 13:51 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > WDYT about this? > > If it sounds reasonable is there any suggestion where to place such a code? > > Customers often use DYI uninterruptible power supplies using capacitors. > But managing a power cut is the least problem you have with MLC NAND. Why is it the least problem, what is the hardest one? I thought this one is the hardest. Artem.