From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 18Je4R-0008P4-00 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:16:27 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <00512BA4F9D3D311912A009027E9B8F407E4A3@NT> References: <00512BA4F9D3D311912A009027E9B8F407E4A3@NT> To: Dave Ellis Cc: 'Ken Offer' , "'linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org'" Subject: Re: Problem: 51MB partition max size on jffs2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:46:59 +0000 Message-ID: <14294.1039027619@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: DGE@sixnetio.com said: > kmalloc() is limited to 128K and the 128MB Flash needs more than > twice that, > so I tried vmalloc() and it seems to be OK (at least with PPC 2.4.18 > patched for the new MTD code). Does anyone know if this change is > safe? You need to change the corresponding kfree() to vfree(). -- dwmw2