From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1432172966.27761.153.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RESEND] IFC: Change IO accessor based on endianness From: Scott Wood To: Brian Norris Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:49:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150519220124.GA11598@ld-irv-0074> References: <1431420591-20453-1-git-send-email-r65777@rhuath.am.freescale.net> <1431438951.16357.490.camel@freescale.com> <20150519220124.GA11598@ld-irv-0074> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Bharat Bhushan , mailman@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, prabhakar@freescale.com, Jaiprakash Singh List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 15:01 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:55:51AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 03:49 -0500, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > > > From: Jaiprakash Singh > > > > > > IFC IO accressor are set at run time based > > > on IFC IP registers endianness.IFC node in > > > DTS file contains information about > > > endianness. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaiprakash Singh > > > --- > > > Tested on T1040RDB, LS2085a, LS1 > > > > > > .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl/ifc.txt | 3 + > > > drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c | 43 +++- > > > drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 258 ++++++++++---------- > > > include/linux/fsl_ifc.h | 50 ++++ > > > 4 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-) > > > > As before, > > Acked-by: Scott Wood > > > > This touches MTD as well as dependencies outside MTD -- which tree > > should it go through? > > I haven't actually seen the patch on linux-mtd. Were we CC'd? If not, > please resend, and CC linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org. (Try > scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find the right people/lists.) linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org was in the To: header. One possible problem is that Bharat sent the patch with a bad (intranet) e-mail address (I've corrected in this e-mail); this may have gotten the patch spam filtered by the maillist server. Bharat, please fix your git send-mail configuration (and don't use rhuath as a development machine). ...though, the previous postings were made by Jaiprakesh with a valid e-mail address, so maybe something else about the patch is hitting a filter. CCing mailman@lists.infradead.org; can someone check logs to see if the list received these e-mails (e.g. v4 sent on December 8th by Jaiprakesh, message id <1418017580-2749-1-git-send-email-b44839@freescale.com>)? > And is this the previous version? > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-November/056249.html It's a previous version, though the current version was previously sent as v4. > I don't mind either tree. I don't think fsl_ifc_nand.c will have > anything noisy in linux-mtd for this release cycle. OK. I'll resend the patch, as my e-mails seem to get through; please either ack or apply (assuming no problems with it). -Scott