linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] kthread: Make it easier to correctly sleep in iterant kthreads
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 13:39:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433763595.1495.35.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608100107.GA3135@pathway.suse.cz>

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 12:01 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

> Just to be sure. Do you suggest to use TASK_IDLE everywhere in
> kthreads or only when the uninterruptible sleep is really needed?

Always, only use INTERRUPTIBLE when you're actually interruptible, that
is you want signals or such muck to terminate your wait.

> IMHO, we should not use TASK_IDLE in freezable kthreads because
> it would break freezing.

How so? The task is IDLE, its not doing anything.

>  Well, we could freezable_schedule() but only
> on locations where it is safe to get freezed. Anyway, we need to
> be careful here.

s/freezed/frozen/

Bah, you made me look at the freezer code, karma reduction for you.

And this is the arch typical freeze point if ever there was one, you're
checking kthread_stop, if we can terminate the kthread, we can certainly
get frozen.

> BTW: What is the preferred way of freezing, please? Is it better
> to end up in the fridge or is it fine to call freezer_do_not_count();
> or set PF_NOFREEZE when it is safe?

freezable_schedule() is fine in this case.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-08 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 15:00 [RFC PATCH 00/18] kthreads/signal: Safer kthread API and signal handling Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 01/18] kthread: Allow to call __kthread_create_on_node() with va_list args Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 02/18] kthread: Add API for iterant kthreads Petr Mladek
2015-06-09  6:23   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-15 12:46     ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 03/18] kthread: Add kthread_stop_current() Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 04/18] signal: Rename kernel_sigaction() to kthread_sigaction() and clean it up Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 05/18] freezer/scheduler: Add freezable_cond_resched() Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 06/18] signal/kthread: Initial implementation of kthread signal handling Petr Mladek
2015-06-06 21:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-08 13:51     ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-08 21:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-15 13:13         ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-15 19:14           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-16  7:54             ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-09  7:10   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-09 12:15     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-06-10  3:13       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 07/18] kthread: Make iterant kthreads freezable by default Petr Mladek
2015-06-09  7:20   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-09 15:53     ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-10  4:31       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-12 13:24         ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-13 23:22           ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-15  9:28             ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 08/18] kthread: Allow to get struct kthread_iterant from task_struct Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 09/18] kthread: Make it easier to correctly sleep in iterant kthreads Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 16:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-08 10:01     ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-08 11:39       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-06-09 15:25         ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-10  9:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-09  7:32       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-08 17:48     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-10  9:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 14:07         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-11  4:28           ` Jiri Kosina
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 10/18] jffs2: Remove forward definition of jffs2_garbage_collect_thread() Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 11/18] jffs2: Convert jffs2_gcd_mtd kthread into the iterant API Petr Mladek
2015-06-06 21:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-06 21:32     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-06-06 22:30       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-06 22:44         ` Jiri Kosina
2015-06-06 22:58           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 12/18] lockd: Convert the central lockd service to kthread_iterant API Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 13/18] ring_buffer: Use iterant kthreads API in the ring buffer benchmark Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 14/18] ring_buffer: Allow to cleanly freeze the ring buffer benchmark kthreads Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 15/18] ring_buffer: Allow to exit the ring buffer benchmark immediately Petr Mladek
2015-06-08 17:44   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-15 15:23     ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-15 15:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-15 15:54         ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 16/18] kthread: Support interruptible sleep with a timeout by iterant kthreads Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 17/18] ring_buffer: Use the new API for a sleep with a timeout in the benchmark Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 18/18] jffs2: Use the new API for a sleep with a timeout Petr Mladek
2015-06-05 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/18] kthreads/signal: Safer kthread API and signal handling Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-09  6:14   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-10 10:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-11 22:02       ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-09  6:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-09  7:58   ` Tejun Heo
2015-06-17 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433763595.1495.35.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).