From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16fluE-0005K8-00 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:00:50 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: Radu Corlan Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: nftl problem Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:12:08 +0000 Message-ID: <1436.1014747128@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: rcorlan@pcnet.ro said: > Before i gave up on nftl, i found the following problem: nftl accesses > the flash through the read_ecc and write_ecc function pointers in the > slave mtd_info structure. However, when the slave structure is > initialised, only the read and write function pointers are filled, not > the read_ecc and write_ecc; i got kernel panic out of this, which got > away when i filled the fields. I don't recall receiving your patch for this. -- dwmw2