public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown
@ 2015-07-08 20:59 Nicholas Krause
  2015-07-08 21:20 ` Richard Weinberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Krause @ 2015-07-08 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dwmw2; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel

This fixes the error paths in the function read_unknown that return
a value to correctly return -EIO rather then the kernel value for
successful function execution of zero to indicate to this function's
callers that a failure has occurred related to I/O and needs to be
handled by this function's caller.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
---
 fs/jffs2/readinode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/readinode.c b/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
index 28e0aab..63bf879 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/readinode.c
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static inline int read_unknown(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_raw_node_re
 			    je16_to_cpu(un->magic), je16_to_cpu(un->nodetype),
 			    je32_to_cpu(un->totlen), je32_to_cpu(un->hdr_crc));
 		jffs2_mark_node_obsolete(c, ref);
-		return 0;
+		return -EIO;
 	}
 
 	un->nodetype = cpu_to_je16(JFFS2_NODE_ACCURATE | je16_to_cpu(un->nodetype));
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static inline int read_unknown(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_raw_node_re
 		JFFS2_NOTICE("unknown RWCOMPAT_DELETE nodetype %#04X at %#08x\n",
 			     je16_to_cpu(un->nodetype), ref_offset(ref));
 		jffs2_mark_node_obsolete(c, ref);
-		return 0;
+		return -EIO;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown
  2015-07-08 20:59 [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown Nicholas Krause
@ 2015-07-08 21:20 ` Richard Weinberger
  2015-07-08 21:20   ` nick
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-07-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicholas Krause; +Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, LKML

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
> This fixes the error paths in the function read_unknown that return
> a value to correctly return -EIO rather then the kernel value for
> successful function execution of zero to indicate to this function's
> callers that a failure has occurred related to I/O and needs to be
> handled by this function's caller.

Did you test this patch?
I guess not.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown
  2015-07-08 21:20 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2015-07-08 21:20   ` nick
  2015-07-08 21:27     ` Richard Weinberger
  2015-07-08 21:28     ` Richard Weinberger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2015-07-08 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, LKML



On 2015-07-08 05:20 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This fixes the error paths in the function read_unknown that return
>> a value to correctly return -EIO rather then the kernel value for
>> successful function execution of zero to indicate to this function's
>> callers that a failure has occurred related to I/O and needs to be
>> handled by this function's caller.
> 
> Did you test this patch?
> I guess not.
> 
No I don't have hardware why?
Nick

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown
  2015-07-08 21:20   ` nick
@ 2015-07-08 21:27     ` Richard Weinberger
  2015-07-08 21:28     ` Richard Weinberger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-07-08 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nick; +Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, LKML

Am 08.07.2015 um 23:20 schrieb nick:
> 
> 
> On 2015-07-08 05:20 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This fixes the error paths in the function read_unknown that return
>>> a value to correctly return -EIO rather then the kernel value for
>>> successful function execution of zero to indicate to this function's
>>> callers that a failure has occurred related to I/O and needs to be
>>> handled by this function's caller.
>>
>> Did you test this patch?
>> I guess not.
>>
> No I don't have hardware why?

It is broken.
Both paths are not fatal errors and the soft error
is already handled by calling jffs2_mark_node_obsolete().

Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown
  2015-07-08 21:20   ` nick
  2015-07-08 21:27     ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2015-07-08 21:28     ` Richard Weinberger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-07-08 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nick; +Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, LKML

>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh, damn. I should have stopped reading here. /ignore.

Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-08 21:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-08 20:59 [PATCH] jffs2:Fix error paths return value for the function read_unknown Nicholas Krause
2015-07-08 21:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-08 21:20   ` nick
2015-07-08 21:27     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-07-08 21:28     ` Richard Weinberger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox