From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay0151.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.151] helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1arAIs-0002KV-Lo for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 20:25:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1460751891.19090.45.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] mtd: nand: fsmc: validate ECC setup by checking algorithm directly From: Joe Perches To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= , Boris Brezillon Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , open list Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:24:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1460751818.19090.43.camel@perches.com> References: <1460750052-16285-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1460750052-16285-10-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1460751818.19090.43.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Why not just add NAND_ECC_SOFT above the default case? Nevermind, misread.