From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1auvNn-0001fO-Oh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:18:00 +0000 Message-ID: <1461647856.32142.1.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Porting kernel MTD tests to user space From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Cc: david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:17:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1461622409-14970-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1461622409-14970-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 00:13 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > David was so kind and did an initial port of Linux's MTD tests to > user space. > He took most tests as-is and massaged them to work in user space > using libmtd. > In the long run the goal is giving up the kernel tests as much as > possible > and improve the tests present in mtd-utils. > > Feedback is very welcome! I would consider moving them, not just porting. Indeed, we probably do not want to have the same code in 2 places, or is there a strong reason why would we want that? Artem.