linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, dedekind1@gmail.com,
	goliath@sigma-star.at, alex@nextthing.co, beanhuo@micron.com,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] ubi: Get rid of __schedule_ubi_work()
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 14:04:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464609874-15488-6-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464609874-15488-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>

Now we can call schedule_ubi_work() directly in a worker
function without the need of a nested parameter and the
helper.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 45 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
index 8e6e8cf..0ed6e39 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
@@ -629,23 +629,19 @@ repeat:
 	spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
 }
 
-static bool wl_work_suspended(struct ubi_device *ubi)
-{
-	return ubi->thread_suspended || !ubi->thread_enabled;
-}
-
 /**
- * __schedule_ubi_work - schedule a work.
+ * schedule_ubi_work - schedule a work.
  * @ubi: UBI device description object
  * @wrk: the work to schedule
  *
  * This function adds a work defined by @wrk to the tail of the pending works
- * list. Can only be used if ubi->work_mutex is already held.
+ * list.
  */
-static void __schedule_ubi_work(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk)
+static void schedule_ubi_work(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk)
 {
 	ubi_assert(ubi->thread_enabled);
 
+	mutex_lock(&ubi->work_mutex);
 	spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wrk->list);
 	kref_init(&wrk->ref);
@@ -656,20 +652,6 @@ static void __schedule_ubi_work(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk)
 	if (!wl_work_suspended(ubi) && !ubi_dbg_is_bgt_disabled(ubi))
 		wake_up_process(ubi->bgt_thread);
 	spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
-}
-
-/**
- * schedule_ubi_work - schedule a work.
- * @ubi: UBI device description object
- * @wrk: the work to schedule
- *
- * This function adds a work defined by @wrk to the tail of the pending works
- * list.
- */
-static void schedule_ubi_work(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&ubi->work_mutex);
-	__schedule_ubi_work(ubi, wrk);
 	mutex_unlock(&ubi->work_mutex);
 }
 
@@ -740,7 +722,7 @@ static int do_sync_erase(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_wl_entry *e,
 	return __erase_worker(ubi, wl_wrk);
 }
 
-static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi, int nested);
+static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi);
 /**
  * wear_leveling_worker - wear-leveling worker function.
  * @ubi: UBI device description object
@@ -1026,7 +1008,7 @@ out_not_moved:
 
 	ubi_free_vid_hdr(ubi, vid_hdr);
 	if (dst_leb_clean) {
-		ensure_wear_leveling(ubi, 1);
+		ensure_wear_leveling(ubi);
 	} else {
 		err = do_sync_erase(ubi, e2, vol_id, lnum, torture);
 		if (err)
@@ -1069,13 +1051,12 @@ out_cancel:
 /**
  * ensure_wear_leveling - schedule wear-leveling if it is needed.
  * @ubi: UBI device description object
- * @nested: set to non-zero if this function is called from UBI worker
  *
  * This function checks if it is time to start wear-leveling and schedules it
  * if yes. This function returns zero in case of success and a negative error
  * code in case of failure.
  */
-static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi, int nested)
+static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 	struct ubi_wl_entry *e1;
@@ -1122,10 +1103,8 @@ static int ensure_wear_leveling(struct ubi_device *ubi, int nested)
 
 	wrk->anchor = 0;
 	wrk->func = &wear_leveling_worker;
-	if (nested)
-		__schedule_ubi_work(ubi, wrk);
-	else
-		schedule_ubi_work(ubi, wrk);
+	schedule_ubi_work(ubi, wrk);
+
 	return err;
 
 out_cancel:
@@ -1173,7 +1152,7 @@ static int __erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk)
 		serve_prot_queue(ubi);
 
 		/* And take care about wear-leveling */
-		err = ensure_wear_leveling(ubi, 1);
+		err = ensure_wear_leveling(ubi);
 		return err;
 	}
 
@@ -1434,7 +1413,7 @@ retry:
 	 * Technically scrubbing is the same as wear-leveling, so it is done
 	 * by the WL worker.
 	 */
-	return ensure_wear_leveling(ubi, 0);
+	return ensure_wear_leveling(ubi);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1718,7 +1697,7 @@ int ubi_wl_init(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_attach_info *ai)
 	ubi->rsvd_pebs += reserved_pebs;
 
 	/* Schedule wear-leveling if needed */
-	err = ensure_wear_leveling(ubi, 0);
+	err = ensure_wear_leveling(ubi);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_free;
 
-- 
2.7.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-30 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30 12:04 [RFC] UBI: MLC Support v0 Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 01/13] ubi: Undo "UBI: modify ubi_wl_flush function to clear work queue for a lnum" Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 02/13] ubi: Rework UBI worker Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 03/13] ubi: auto re-size after UBI thread is ready Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 04/13] ubi: Kill ubi->alc_mutex Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 14:05   ` Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 06/13] ubi: Remove tst_disable_bgt debugfs knob Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 07/13] ubi: Move work related functions to work.c Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 08/13] ubi: Remove lnum and vol_id from erase work Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 09/13] ubi: Remove usless debug info from wear_leveling_worker() Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 10/13] ubi: SLC mode Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 11/13] ubi: LEB consolidation Richard Weinberger
2016-06-07 12:20   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 12/13] ubi: Add debugfs knob to force " Richard Weinberger
2016-05-30 12:04 ` [PATCH 13/13] ubi: Add debugfs knob to trigger " Richard Weinberger
2016-06-03 12:40 ` [RFC] UBI: MLC Support v0 Boris Brezillon
2016-06-24 14:48   ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1464609874-15488-6-git-send-email-richard@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=alex@nextthing.co \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=goliath@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).