From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <owner-mtd@infradead.org>
Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2)
	id 14QYNx-0001Qp-00
	for mtd-list@infradead.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:28:05 +0000
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com)
	by infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #2)
	id 14QYNv-0001Qj-00
	for mtd@infradead.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:28:04 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <14977.33773.1956.20539@pyramid.insynq.com> 
References: <14977.33773.1956.20539@pyramid.insynq.com>  <14976.15973.43530.527006@pyramid.insynq.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102061909140.2237-100000@imladris.demon.co.uk> 
To: "Ian Eure <Ian Eure" <ieure@insynq.com>
Cc: mtd@infradead.org
Subject: Re: doc2k: "formatting block"? 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:27:16 +0000
Message-ID: <14732.981566836@redhat.com>
Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org
List-ID: <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>


Ian Eure" <ieure@insynq.com said:
> it's reproducible, but only with this one 32mb doc2000. i only have
> this chip, and a 48mb doc2000 for testing right now.

Same block every time, or different blocks?

> the doc had been written to by the m-sys driver before. 

Immediately before the boot on which the trouble was seen, or at some
distant point in the past?

--
dwmw2




To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org