From: RogerCC.Lin <rogercc.lin@mediatek.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/28] [v2] mtd: mtk: avoid warning in mtk_ecc_encode
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:12:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476785552.24626.4.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018071948.0b7eef05@bbrezillon>
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 07:19 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:05:31 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> > When building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized, gcc produces a silly false positive
> > warning for the mtk_ecc_encode function:
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c: In function 'mtk_ecc_encode':
> > drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c:402:15: error: 'val' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >
> > The function for some reason contains a double byte swap on big-endian
> > builds to get the OOB data into the correct order again, and is written
> > in a slightly confusing way.
> >
> > Using a simple memcpy32_fromio() to read the data simplifies it a lot
> > so it becomes more readable and produces no warning. However, the
> > output might not have 32-bit alignment, so we have to use another
> > memcpy to avoid taking alignment faults or writing beyond the end
> > of the array.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Jorge, RogerCC, can I have an Acked-by and/or Tested-by for this patch?
Tested, this patch is OK,
Tested-by: RogerCC Lin <rogercc.lin@mediatek.com>
>
> > ---
> > v2: move temporary buffer into struct mtk_ecc instead of having it
> > on the stack, as suggested by Boris Brezillon
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c
> > index d54f666..dbf2562 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c
> > @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ struct mtk_ecc {
> > struct completion done;
> > struct mutex lock;
> > u32 sectors;
> > +
> > + u8 eccdata[112];
> > };
> >
> > static inline void mtk_ecc_wait_idle(struct mtk_ecc *ecc,
> > @@ -366,9 +368,8 @@ int mtk_ecc_encode(struct mtk_ecc *ecc, struct mtk_ecc_config *config,
> > u8 *data, u32 bytes)
> > {
> > dma_addr_t addr;
> > - u8 *p;
> > - u32 len, i, val;
> > - int ret = 0;
> > + u32 len;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > addr = dma_map_single(ecc->dev, data, bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > ret = dma_mapping_error(ecc->dev, addr);
> > @@ -393,14 +394,12 @@ int mtk_ecc_encode(struct mtk_ecc *ecc, struct mtk_ecc_config *config,
> >
> > /* Program ECC bytes to OOB: per sector oob = FDM + ECC + SPARE */
> > len = (config->strength * ECC_PARITY_BITS + 7) >> 3;
> > - p = data + bytes;
> >
> > - /* write the parity bytes generated by the ECC back to the OOB region */
> > - for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> > - if ((i % 4) == 0)
> > - val = readl(ecc->regs + ECC_ENCPAR(i / 4));
> > - p[i] = (val >> ((i % 4) * 8)) & 0xff;
> > - }
> > + /* write the parity bytes generated by the ECC back to temp buffer */
> > + __ioread32_copy(ecc->eccdata, ecc->regs + ECC_ENCPAR(0), round_up(len, 4));
> > +
> > + /* copy into possibly unaligned OOB region with actual length */
> > + memcpy(data + bytes, ecc->eccdata, len);
> > timeout:
> >
> > dma_unmap_single(ecc->dev, addr, bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 22:03 [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 02/28] [v2] mtd: mtk: avoid warning in mtk_ecc_encode Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-18 10:12 ` RogerCC.Lin [this message]
2016-10-18 19:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/28] UBI: fix uninitialized access of vid_hdr pointer Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-17 22:19 ` [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:08 ` [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476785552.24626.4.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=rogercc.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).