Re: [PATCH 10/10] mtd: spi-nor: aspeed: optimize read mode

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 23:51 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 11:40 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > Strong disagreement here :-)
> > 
> > DT is not *strictly* HW properties. Never was despite what some
> > fanatics around might say :-) Its also platform properties and can
> > include policies.
> 
> /me grabs popcorn ... :-)

Be my guest ! I only invented the bloody thing in the first place after
all ;-) (Well, the FDT format rather, and its use in Linux, the DT
itself dates back from Open Firmware).

> > We put things like UART speeds in there, MAC addresses, etc...
> 
> UART speeds or UART max/allowed speeds ? That's basically HW property
> since flaky HW might not allow all sorts of UART speed options. MAC
> address is a HW property.

Both. The point is that there is no hard lines. Every time people come
up with hard lines, we end up with inflexible horror shows that fail to
solve practical issues on the field.

There is no good reason to forbid passing such a simple policy argument
that way. None. Other than ideological that is.

> > it makes
> > sense to put calibration info and in this case, request to perform
> > SW
> > calibration.
> 
> That's a hard question and I don't have the right answer to this.

I do, and it's fine :-)

> > Module parameters are crap. They are a major pain to use, they are
> > in
> > practice only good for tweaking/experimenting.
> 
> That's correct, but then turning the calibration off would probably
> be only used in such experimental setups or during HW bringup (if at
> all).
> Based on the discussion thus far, my impression is that thepreferred
> and mostly used default is calibration enabled.

Probably yes. So we could reverse the problem and say that we have
the calibration enabled by default, and an optional device-tree
property to force a fixed speed.

That becomes akin to what we do with Ethernet PHYs for example :)

Cheers,
Ben.

> 
>