From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1d5S9u-0005AJ-V6 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 07:23:44 +0000 Message-ID: <1493709798.797.18.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: ubifs: set s_uuid in super block From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger , Oleksij Rempel , adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Steffen Trumtrar Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 10:23:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: <5d7d0f21-d87f-0835-c2f6-b6c9e07f73a8@nod.at> References: <20170411095055.26328-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20170411095055.26328-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <5d7d0f21-d87f-0835-c2f6-b6c9e07f73a8@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 22:43 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Makes sense. > > Artem, do you remember why UBIFS didn't set s_uuid in first place? Just did not notice it I think.