From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Various fixes and enhancements
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 02:41:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505122921-5534-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)
This series does several bug fixes and clean ups against the intel-spi
spi-nor driver, as well as enhancements to make the driver independent
on the underlying BIOS/bootloader.
At present the driver uses the HW sequencer for the read/write/erase on
all supported platforms, read_reg/write_reg for BXT, and the SW sequencer
for read_reg/write_reg for BYT/LPT. The way the driver uses the HW and SW
sequencer relies on some programmed register settings and hence creates
unneeded dependencies with the underlying BIOS/bootloader. For example,
the driver unfortunately does not work as expected when booting from
Intel Baytrail FSP based bootloaders like U-Boot, as the Baytrail FSP
does not set up some SPI controller settings to make the driver happy.
Now such limitation has been removed with this series.
Changes in v2:
- Add stable kernel tags in the commit message (patch [03/10])
- Fix typo of 'operatoin' (patch [10/10])
- Add Mika Westerberg's 'Acked-by' tag
Bin Meng (10):
spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix number of protected range registers for
BYT/LPT
spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove useless 'buf' parameter in the HW/SW cycle
spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix broken software sequencing codes
spi-nor: intel-spi: Check transfer length in the HW/SW cycle
spi-nor: intel-spi: Use SW sequencer for BYT/LPT
spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove 'Atomic Cycle Sequence' in
intel_spi_write()
spi-nor: intel-spi: Don't assume OPMENU0/1 to be programmed by BIOS
spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove the unnecessary HSFSTS register RW
spi-nor: intel-spi: Rename swseq to swseq_reg in 'struct intel_spi'
spi-nor: intel-spi: Fall back to use SW sequencer to erase
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 151 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--
2.9.2
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 9:41 Bin Meng [this message]
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix number of protected range registers for BYT/LPT Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove useless 'buf' parameter in the HW/SW cycle Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix broken software sequencing codes Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Check transfer length in the HW/SW cycle Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Use SW sequencer for BYT/LPT Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove 'Atomic Cycle Sequence' in intel_spi_write() Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Don't assume OPMENU0/1 to be programmed by BIOS Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove the unnecessary HSFSTS register RW Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Rename swseq to swseq_reg in 'struct intel_spi' Bin Meng
2017-09-11 9:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fall back to use SW sequencer to erase Bin Meng
2017-09-11 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Various fixes and enhancements Joakim Tjernlund
2017-09-13 2:11 ` Bin Meng
2017-09-13 9:47 ` mika.westerberg
2017-10-11 8:06 ` Cyrille Pitchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505122921-5534-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox