From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16PBU8-0007vb-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:53:20 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: <20020104085040.A48397@idiom.com> <179401c19af8$a0418560$4101220a@csteinathlon> To: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: "Charles Steinkuehler" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Atmel Flash Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 00:04:11 +0000 Message-ID: <15105.1010793851@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ebiederman@lnxi.com said: > "Charles Steinkuehler" writes: > > Are the small-sector Atmel flash (ie 29C010/29C040) parts supported by > > MTD? > > > These are the parts with 128/256 Byte sector size (ie 1024 128 byte > > sectors in the '010, and 2048 256 byte sectors in the '040), with no > > explicit erase command required before writing new data. > Other atmel parts are. If they aren't cfi then there is the issue > that they aren't in the table jedec_probe.c. But it should be > trivial to add them. I think the other supported Atmel parts are the ones with the conventional command set. These ones are different. It's not too hard to write support for them though. -- dwmw2