From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16A65F-0002Su-00 for ; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 09:05:17 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20011127141357.A29578@kosh.hut.fi> References: <20011127141357.A29578@kosh.hut.fi> To: Jarkko Lavinen Cc: MTD List Subject: Re: CFI driver & flash banks Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 09:15:19 +0000 Message-ID: <15120.1007198119@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jlavi@iki.fi said: > Instead of accessing chip->state, should one also be able to access > each banks like state chip->banks[bank].state ? Yep. In fact that 'struct flchip' would be more accurately named 'flbank' anyway - you need everything from it duplicated except the timing information, I think. -- dwmw2