From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com ([209.85.219.223]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NUfX8-0000EO-VU for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:07:43 +0000 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so19854ewy.4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:07:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jonringle@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1263271808.30988.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <152584231001111056n2d174f8fmef6641c4fee99781@mail.gmail.com> <152584231001111620i6b397f43n49733caa8f92f472@mail.gmail.com> <1263271808.30988.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:07:36 -0500 Message-ID: <152584231001120407m6fc901edrd6584f55edc04341@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Fail to mount ubifs From: Jon Ringle To: dedekind1@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wr= ote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 19:20 -0500, Jon Ringle wrote: >> I should be able to mount an empty ubi volume as ubifs right? >> But I get this on a freshly made volume: >> UBIFS error (pid 1493): check_lpt_crc: invalid crc in LPT node: crc >> cbcb calc cbfb >> >> I'm not sure what to try now... > > As this entry suggests: > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_how_send_bugreport > > - validate your flash/driver with the MTD tests - looks like you have a > problem there. I will try the tests today and report back. >> (initramfs) ubinfo -a >> UBI version: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01 >> Count of UBI devices: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 1 >> UBI control device major/minor: 10:60 >> Present UBI devices: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ubi0 >> >> ubi0 >> Volumes count: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 2 >> Logical eraseblock size: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 130944 bytes, f= KiB > > Hmm, this f KiB looks weird. Why is it weird? It is 128 bytes less than my PEB size of 0x20000. Jon