linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Per Förlin" <per.forlin@axis.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Add volume read and write statistics
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:01:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531839678791.88043@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2086360.zJZoXgJm6x@blindfold>

Thanks Richard for your feedback,

> ________________________________________
> From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 4:34 PM
> To: Per Förlin
> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Artem Bityutskiy
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Add volume read and write statistics
> 
> Per,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2018, 14:08:51 CEST schrieb Per Förlin:
> > > To: Per Förlin
> > > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Artem Bityutskiy; Per Förlin
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Add volume read and write statistics
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2018, 12:30:19 CEST schrieb Per Forlin:
> > > > Simple read and write statistics.
> > > > * Bytes read
> > > > * Bytes written
> > > > * Number of reads
> > > > * Number of writes
> > > >
> > > > This is useful to find out how the storage is being utilized.
> > > > For block devices this already exists via /proc/diskstats.
> > > > The intention of this patch is to add similar stats
> > > > for UBI as well.
> > >
> > > Why on UBI level and not MTD?
> > In my case I wanted to evaluate the performance per volume. I have one MTD
> > device with several UBI volumes. It would be sufficient to have it on
> > an MTD level to see the overall storage usage.
> > This would still be very helpful for me.
> >
> > Having it on an MTD level is of course more general.
> > I wouldn't mind changing the patch to add the stats in mtdcore
> > for mtd_read() and mtd_write()
> >
> > In case of MTD block devices the stats will be somewhat redundant with
> > /proc/diskstats.
> >
> > Do you think I should update the patch to add MTD stats instead?
> 
> While having a cup of coffee I thought more about this.
> Actually both, MTD and UBI makes sense.
> The most important issue is that you integrate it with the existing diskstats.
> So instead of having our own interface feeding MTD/UBI stats into diskstats
> would be nice. Did you look into that? I'm not sure how much work this would be.
> That way users can use existing tools such as iostat...
I actually started out looking for the information under diskstats,
then I learned it's only for block devices. I took a quick glance at
it before I went for the sys implementation instead. diskstats is
separated from the MTD and UBI stuff and I don't know if one can make a
connection to MTD/UBI somehow. I will take a closer look at this.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-17 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-17 10:30 [PATCH] UBI: Add volume read and write statistics Per Forlin
2018-07-17 10:39 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-17 12:08   ` Per Förlin
2018-07-17 14:34     ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-17 15:01       ` Per Förlin [this message]
2018-07-17 15:06         ` Steve deRosier
2018-07-17 15:10           ` Richard Weinberger
2018-07-18 20:17             ` Per Förlin
2018-07-19 10:18               ` Per Förlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1531839678791.88043@axis.com \
    --to=per.forlin@axis.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).