From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17sPCb-0007nR-00 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:56:17 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <14573.1032532613@redhat.com> References: <14573.1032532613@redhat.com> <1032494909.1059.41.camel@www.avantwave.com> <1032432851.1847.22.camel@www.avantwave.com> <28606.1032433176@redhat.com> Cc: Victor Tse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2 BUG() in gc.c:135 "Checked all inodes but still..." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:56:13 +0100 Message-ID: <15779.1032533773@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: dwmw2@infradead.org said: > I can fix the fact that we screw up the accounting and hit the BUG() > when we get this error. OK, I think I've done this -- CVS update and try again. Now you should just lose data when you get flash errors like this, rather than hitting my accounting sanity checks and getting a BUG(). I'm still not wonderfully happy with what you're seeing though. -- dwmw2