From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15eYPS-0002QG-00 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:51:46 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB6B6B21@mailse01.axis.se> References: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB6B6B21@mailse01.axis.se> To: Jonas Holmberg Cc: mtd , Wojciech Kromer Subject: Re: JFFS2 on 8MB Flash-Chip conneted to MPC850 works extremly slo w:( Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:57:47 +0100 Message-ID: <15879.999680267@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jonas.holmberg@axis.com said: > I sometimes get decompression errors from cramfs with a configuration > like that. My guess is that you really shouldn't have a > cramfs-partition on the same flash- chip as a jffs or jffs2 partition > since cramfs doesn't use mtd and does not know if the chip is busy > writing or erasing? The mtdblock driver ought to deal with it correctly. If it doesn't, it's broken. -- dwmw2