public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com, Jonas Holmberg <jonashg@axis.com>
Cc: Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@axis.com>,
	Linux mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cii@axis.com>
Subject: Re: Actual usage of files in ubifs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:57:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1682206.lC8nDS1gi7@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505144649.14367.85.camel@gmail.com>

Am Montag, 11. September 2017, 17:44:09 CEST schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > Good point. I was solely thinking along the lines of how much space
> > the
> > actual file occupied, not considering metadata. That would be a good
> > starting point. I'm guessing that for moderate file sizes the
> > metadata
> > would be relatively small compared to the file itself?
> 
> I would think a "slow" version of this would not be that hard to
> implement - walk the index and sum up node sizes. Subtract header sizes
> if you do not want metadata.
> 
> I am not sure what would be the API? Do other FSes implement something
> like this?

I think a "show MTD usage by inode" should be implementable via debugfs.
Maybe, after a discussion on linux-fsdevel a per-file ioctl().

But first I'd like to know more about the use-case and where to draw the 
border.
e.g. If a file as xattrs, do you also account them? UBIFS modules xattrs
via inodes. So, they have a rather huge space overhead.

Thanks,
//richard

-- 
sigma star gmbh - Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 6 - 6020 Innsbruck - Austria
ATU66964118 - FN 374287y

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-11  9:47 Actual usage of files in ubifs Ricard Wanderlof
2017-09-11 14:55 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-09-11 15:18   ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-09-11 15:44     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2017-09-11 19:57       ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2017-09-12  9:15         ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-09-12 14:52           ` Richard Weinberger
2017-09-15 22:08             ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-09-16  6:32               ` Richard Weinberger
2017-09-18  6:37                 ` Ricard Wanderlof

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1682206.lC8nDS1gi7@blindfold \
    --to=richard@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=cii@axis.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonashg@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ricard.wanderlof@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox