From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17mCtO-0007cx-00 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:34:50 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020903104437.GA15756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20020903104437.GA15756@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [patch] added cfi_cmdset_0020.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:34:49 +0100 Message-ID: <16859.1031056489@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de said: > This adds cfi_cmdset_0020.c and hooks it into most places. No help > text yet, but that isn't covered by the cvs anyway. patches/Config.help Do we really need a completely separate copy, or could we get away with making the existing cfi_cmdset_0001 code handle this too? Or have we had this conversation already and I'm just having a bad week? -- dwmw2