From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "Curtis, Allen" <Allen.Curtis@Thales-IFS.com>
Cc: "'linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org'" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: jffs2_scan_eraseblock() - errors
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16950.1028074550@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FA06AA2C99BCD511951200005A99441001E3ECC5@irvexch1.sextantifs.com>
Allen.Curtis@Thales-IFS.com said:
> Has anyone characterized the performance of the JFFS* file-systems
> over time? Our initial tests indicated that JFFS2 was faster than
> JFFS. After using the JFFS2 file-system and maintaining a relatively
> consistent utilization there was a 4X increase in the time required to
> complete a mount operation. Is this expected? Is there a worse case?
> See below for some measurements.
It's expected. See the TODO file for notes on how we intend to fix it.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 23:59 jffs2_scan_eraseblock() - errors Curtis, Allen
2002-07-31 0:15 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-07-31 0:18 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-31 23:02 Curtis, Allen
2002-08-01 10:44 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 1:15 Curtis, Allen
2002-07-31 3:07 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 0:38 Curtis, Allen
2002-07-31 0:48 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-30 23:30 Curtis, Allen
2002-07-30 23:42 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-30 18:11 Curtis, Allen
2002-07-30 22:21 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 10:34 ` Jörn Engel
2002-07-31 11:45 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 11:57 ` Jörn Engel
2002-07-31 11:59 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 12:16 ` Jörn Engel
2002-07-31 12:17 ` David Woodhouse
2002-07-31 13:07 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16950.1028074550@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Allen.Curtis@Thales-IFS.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox