From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 173BsP-0003Ea-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2002 09:23:45 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3CD0E35B.4010606@bigpond.com> References: <3CD0E35B.4010606@bigpond.com> To: brendan.simon@bigpond.com Cc: mtd Subject: Re: docprobe.c on PowerPC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: <17308.1020327805@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: brendan.simon@bigpond.com said: > Where do these definitions come from (or where are they supposed to > be defined) ? In GCC, the linux kernel or should the MTD code use > __PPC__ instead ??? They come from GCC and aren't really expected to be consistent across architectures. I've changed docprobe.c to use __PPC__. Thanks for pointing it out. I don't remember where that PPC address came from - perhaps they should be platform-specific like the Ocelot one, not arch-specific. -- dwmw2