* Q: interleave logic?
@ 2001-05-03 19:04 Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-03 21:43 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2001-05-03 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
What do we have nasty half incomplete interleave
logic all throughout the cfi code?
It looks like it could be done more cleanly with a wrapper
around the probe code, and a wrapper around the mapping driver.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Q: interleave logic?
2001-05-03 19:04 Q: interleave logic? Eric W. Biederman
@ 2001-05-03 21:43 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-04 1:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2001-05-03 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: linux-mtd
ebiederman@lnxi.com said:
> What do we have nasty half incomplete interleave logic all throughout
> the cfi code?
> It looks like it could be done more cleanly with a wrapper around the
> probe code, and a wrapper around the mapping driver.
The chip driver needs to know about the interleave to some extent - it's
got to be able to deal with errors on individual chips in the interleave.
(How well we actually do that at the moment is a different question, of
course.)
I thought the macros that were introduced (by Nico?) were roughly the right
thing. If you have better suggestions, though, I'm interested.
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Q: interleave logic?
2001-05-03 21:43 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2001-05-04 1:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2001-05-04 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Eric W. Biederman, linux-mtd
On Thu, 3 May 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I thought the macros that were introduced (by Nico?) were roughly the right
> thing. If you have better suggestions, though, I'm interested.
I did the work towards generic interleave support only for cmdset-001. Last
time I had a look the work wasn't completely done for cmdset-002.
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-04 1:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-03 19:04 Q: interleave logic? Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-03 21:43 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-04 1:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox