From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17ZhfM-0005Yw-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:48:40 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: "Curtis, Allen" Cc: "'linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org'" Subject: Re: jffs2_scan_eraseblock() - errors Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <17606.1028076517@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Allen.Curtis@Thales-IFS.com said: > THX, anything like that for JFFS? Unfortunately that is what we are > shipping now and it gets VERY slow, even with our GCD nice level > modification. Dunno. You could try increasing JFFS_HASH_SIZE but it may not be a bottleneck there -- it's been a very long time since I've looked seriously at JFFS1 code. Again, profile data are useful. -- dwmw2