* BLKRRPART bug in NFTL? [not found] <E15ZVks-00081M-00@pentafluge.infradead.org> @ 2001-08-23 12:42 ` ASA 2001-08-24 2:15 ` Alexandru Harsanyi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: ASA @ 2001-08-23 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mtd Hello all, tried anybody to use *fdisk on DiskOnChip2000 from ramdisk and got expected results? I'm automating linux installation, so such thing is needed... My system consists of: hardware: special embedded motherboard with AMD 486DX4-100 8 MB RAM DiskOnChip 2000 (8 MB flash) software: linux kernel 2.4.1 with MTD 20010730 snapshot root filesystem on /dev/ram0 (loaded via cmdline: initrd=inird.gz root=/dev/ram0) All is based on debian potato (2.2; glibc 2.1; some utils, including sfdisk, are upgraded in order to proper work with 2.4 kernel) Symptoms are: after executing #deleting any partition for sanity dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nftla bs=512 count=1 # BLKRRPART ioctl (reread partition information) sfdisk -R /dev/nftla # making 5 and 3 megs partitions on 8 MiB DOC echo ",5000,L,*;,,L;;" | sfdisk -f /dev/nftla # make sure partition information is reread sfdisk -R /dev/nftla the root filesystem (ramdisk) is screwed up! again, after clean reboot only invoking BLKRRPART ioctl is enough to break ramdisk in the same configuration, operating with hard disks instead of DOC is absolutely . Also, to reproduce this bug in other environment (only the kernel is the same) I tried to put my kernel (2.4.1+MTD-20010730) on the debian installation diskette and after using cfdisk ramdisk was screwed again... -- Best regards, ASA mailto:atris@mail.ru ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: BLKRRPART bug in NFTL? 2001-08-23 12:42 ` BLKRRPART bug in NFTL? ASA @ 2001-08-24 2:15 ` Alexandru Harsanyi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Alexandru Harsanyi @ 2001-08-24 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Mtd I'm not sure about that, but I think DOC should be formated/partitioned with nftl_format, not *fdisk. Best Regards, Alex. ASA wrote: > > Hello all, > > tried anybody to use *fdisk on DiskOnChip2000 from ramdisk > and got expected results? > > I'm automating linux installation, so such thing is needed... > > My system consists of: > hardware: > special embedded motherboard with AMD 486DX4-100 > 8 MB RAM > DiskOnChip 2000 (8 MB flash) > software: > linux kernel 2.4.1 with MTD 20010730 snapshot > root filesystem on /dev/ram0 (loaded via cmdline: initrd=inird.gz root=/dev/ram0) > > All is based on debian potato (2.2; glibc 2.1; some utils, including > sfdisk, are upgraded in order to proper work with 2.4 kernel) > > Symptoms are: > after executing > > #deleting any partition for sanity > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nftla bs=512 count=1 > # BLKRRPART ioctl (reread partition information) > sfdisk -R /dev/nftla > > # making 5 and 3 megs partitions on 8 MiB DOC > echo ",5000,L,*;,,L;;" | sfdisk -f /dev/nftla > > # make sure partition information is reread > sfdisk -R /dev/nftla > > the root filesystem (ramdisk) is screwed up! > > again, after clean reboot only invoking > BLKRRPART ioctl is enough to break ramdisk > > in the same configuration, operating with hard disks instead of DOC > is absolutely . > > Also, to reproduce this bug in other environment (only the kernel is > the same) I tried to put my kernel (2.4.1+MTD-20010730) on the debian > installation diskette and after using cfdisk ramdisk was screwed again... > > -- > Best regards, > ASA mailto:atris@mail.ru > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-24 2:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E15ZVks-00081M-00@pentafluge.infradead.org>
2001-08-23 12:42 ` BLKRRPART bug in NFTL? ASA
2001-08-24 2:15 ` Alexandru Harsanyi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox