From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 14uqMG-0006Yc-00 for ; Wed, 02 May 2001 07:43:32 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3AEF5A56.7E57CE22@sis.com.tw> References: <3AEF5A56.7E57CE22@sis.com.tw> <004f01c0d188$4688c5e0$88b4b8d1@ShuhIII> <21813.988381415@redhat.com> <2494.988646431@redhat.com> To: Ollie Lho Cc: "Shuh C. Chang" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Is DOC Address 0xC8000 Something Special? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 07:34:24 +0100 Message-ID: <17857.988785264@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ollie@sis.com.tw said: > What was it ?? Quadrupling the number of delay cycles in DoC_Delay(). http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2001-April/000488.html -- dwmw2