From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lilium.sigma-star.at ([109.75.188.150]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1elM6j-0008OJ-7i for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:57:54 +0000 From: Richard Weinberger To: Boris Brezillon Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Joern Engel , Robert Jarzmik , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Kyungmin Park , Artem Bityutskiy , Solarflare linux maintainers , Edward Cree , Bert Kenward , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Miquel Raynal Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: Stop assuming mtd_erase() is asynchronous Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1794415.MYW8eb4nQC@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20180212210311.23244-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> References: <20180212210311.23244-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> <20180212210311.23244-4-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018, 22:03:09 CET schrieb Boris Brezillon: > None of the mtd->_erase() implementations work in an asynchronous manner, > so let's simplify MTD users that call mtd_erase(). All they need to do > is check the value returned by mtd_erase() and assume that != 0 means > failure. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard