From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13LmO0-0000nA-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2000 13:52:08 +0100 Received: from dns.cygnus.co.uk ([194.130.39.3] helo=pasanda.cygnus.co.uk) by infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13LmNz-0000n4-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2000 13:52:07 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <398E8115.6FDC06BF@arcom.co.uk> References: <398E8115.6FDC06BF@arcom.co.uk> To: David Vrabel Cc: mtd@infradead.org Subject: Re: CFI chip detection Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 13:51:51 +0100 Message-ID: <19240.965652711@cygnus.co.uk> Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: dvrabel@arcom.co.uk said: > Removing the `* cfi.interleave' caused additional chips to be > detected. Is this a quirk particular to this board or is the above > code wrong? > The SBC-MediaGX has: > 1x 28F640 in x8 mode for the 8 Mbyte board > 2x 28F640 in x8 mode for the 16 Mbyte board Odd. How exactly are the chips mapped in the 16 MB board? Are they interleaved, or just concurrently mapped? Can you show the output when it fails to detect the second chip? -- dwmw2 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org