From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16sZa0-0003YU-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 02:28:52 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020402132818.A10402@friction.hpl.hp.com> References: <20020402132818.A10402@friction.hpl.hp.com> To: Christopher Hoover Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: 2.5.7{,-rmk1}: jffs2 on root patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 02:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: <19796.1017797325@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ch@hpl.hp.com said: > 2.5.7-rmk1 (and apparently any 2.5.7 kernel, hence the cross-posting) > requires the following patch, if you wish to use a jffs2 file system > as your root. Without the patch, mount_block_root() won't attempt to > use jffs2. I don't like it. We don't require a block device, and I'd rather see the mechanism fixed to pass the 'root=' argument to the file system, so we can use the new mount-by-name functionality on the rootfs. -- dwmw2