Re: [PATCH] fs: ubifs: Add i_version support

[Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>]

Sascha,

Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 16:23:18 CEST schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> > So, for the IMA use-case we don't even have to persist i_version.
> > That would be cool.
> 
> Yes, that's what earlier versions of this patch did, nacked by Christoph
> 
> Hellwig with the words:
> > Maybe IMA doesn't care, but if you set MS_I_VERSION the fs does give
> > a guarantee.  Sp NAK on this patch as-is.
> 
> (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/61)
> 
> Reading this sentence again it may be a possibility to just increase the
> i_version field without setting the MS_I_VERSION flag.

Yes.

> > I need to read what other filesystems do, it is still not completely clear
> > to me what the expected i_version semantics are. Satisfying IMA seems to
> > be easy but we need to be very sure to not break other futuer i_version
> > users...
> Sure. I am also not sure whether I implemented it correctly since it's
> implementation defined by some filesystem drivers which I am afraid are
> not even consistent.

As usual, let's try to keep at least UBIFS kind of sane. ;-)

Thanks,
//richard