From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from na3sys009aog105.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XFXhs-0006ME-Nq for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:06:53 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so6262191pad.38 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dbowen3 (c-71-199-15-226.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [71.199.15.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jf8sm1034678pbd.5.2014.08.07.17.06.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:06:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Daniel Bowen" To: Subject: Question about ubiformat Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:06:27 -0600 Message-ID: <1a5301cfb29c$9a4ec6d0$ceec5470$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-language: en-us List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Let's say that I've prepared an image using mkfs.ubifs and ubinize. Is there any advantage, disadvantage or difference to doing ubiformat twice - once without specifying an image file, then running it a second time with an image file? In other words, is there a difference between these two sequences: ubiformat /dev/mtd4 ubiformat /dev/mtd4 -f /mnt/source/ubi.img and ubiformat /dev/mtd4 -f /mnt/source/ubi.img Thanks! -Daniel