Re: JFFS3 & performance

Josh Boyer
2005-01-13T19:22:51Z

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:36, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 10:30 -0800, Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > I think it says it's worth adding a no-checksum option to serve this
> > potential userbase that just doesn't need the checksums but does need
> > the speed.
>
> You may be right. That doesn't make me relish the thought of providing
> support to people who do that though :)
>
> Perhaps we could make it a mount option, and that way it's easy enough
> for people to turn it on if they have problems, before we'll talk to
> them about it.

Sure, and option would be fine with me. Just as long as there is the
choice for those of us in the tin-foil hats :).

josh