Re: including doc2001 and docprobe into the kernel

David Woodhouse
2000-12-03T18:13:59Z

On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Levi Khatskevitch wrote:

> If mtd-patch-* are gone from cvs what is the right procedure to bring
> the latest mtd code into the kernel tree? Is is to apply a partial
> patch mtd-*.infra.patch and then use patchin.sh? If that's so we need
> to have new mtd-2.2.17.infra.patch and probably update or remove
> mtd-2.2.14.infra.patch and mtd-2.2.16.infra.patch, they are way
> outdated.

The patch still exists, and the procedure for applying it is just the same
- except that now you download it from the FTP site, rather than clogging
up the CVS tree with it.

I've removed all the extra files from the CVS tree, too.

> BTW mtd-patch-2.2.17-20001130-1700GMT from ftp site still inserts
> put_module_symbol even though it's not used anywhere in the source.

Thanks. I'll try to remember to remove that part next time I make a patch.

--
dwmw2