From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from borg.org ([208.218.135.231]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15RhuG-0005jH-00 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:22:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:28:15 -0400 From: Kent Borg To: Vipin Malik Cc: Linux Mtd Subject: Re: infradead.org vs kernel.org sources Message-ID: <20010731182815.B12303@borg.org> References: <30724FF712DFD2119E6200104B244892011974C6@mail1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <30724FF712DFD2119E6200104B244892011974C6@mail1>; from Vipin.Malik@daniel.com on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:05:33PM -0500 Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:05:33PM -0500, Vipin Malik wrote: > AFAIK latest stuff is in the CVS repo. IF you are comparing with the stuff > in the release kernels (is that what you meant by kernel.org?) then you > should be working off the CVS. Cool. > >-kb, the Kent who hopes to get JFFS working on top of MTD. > Why? Why not JFFS2? It's more stable and full featured (and not to mention > next gen from JFFS). As long as you are using 2.4.x as JFFS2 does not yet > work with 2.2.x Oops. I was being sloppy and using "JFFS" as a kinda generic term. Certainly I expect to go for JFFS2. Thanks a bunch, -kb, the Kent who has hacked at flash before, but who is new at these specifics.