mtdchar major , 90 or 91?

mtdchar major , 90 or 91?

[Nikolai Vladychevski]

Why in MAKEDEV the char device has major 90 and in mtdchar.c it has 
redefined from 90 to 91 in one of the first lines of code: 

#undef MTD_CHAR_MAJOR
#define MTD_CHAR_MAJOR 91 

I had to comment this definition in order to recognize /dev/mtd0 in the doc 
millenium ....  this is strange, why this numbers change from place to 
place? 

Nikolai
p.s.
I downloaded lastests release 2 days ago from cvs

Re: mtdchar major , 90 or 91?

[David Woodhouse]

niko@isl.net.mx said:
>  Why in MAKEDEV the char device has major 90 and in mtdchar.c it has
> redefined from 90 to 91 in one of the first lines of code: 

Eep, sorry. That was a local hack which shouldn't have escaped my tree. 
Reverted.

--
dwmw2

Re: mtdchar major , 90 or 91?

[Nikolai Vladychevski]

David Woodhouse writes: 

> 
> niko@isl.net.mx said:
>>  Why in MAKEDEV the char device has major 90 and in mtdchar.c it has
>> redefined from 90 to 91 in one of the first lines of code: 
> 
> Eep, sorry. That was a local hack which shouldn't have escaped my tree. 
> Reverted. 
> 

that's what I tought, last question, do you think I can use the lastest cvs 
for production, or I should stay on 20000704.....  (It's just I wanted to 
use Ollie Who's new DoC millenium driver and be up to date.....) 


Nikolai

Re: mtdchar major , 90 or 91?

[David Woodhouse]

niko@isl.net.mx said:
>  that's what I tought, last question, do you think I can use the
> lastest cvs  for production, or I should stay on 20000704.....  (It's
> just I wanted to  use Ollie Who's new DoC millenium driver and be up
> to date.....) 


Definitely use the latest CVS. 

--
dwmw2