From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [200.53.172.215] (helo=qis) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15aHev-0003Dd-00 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:10:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20010824131854.1607.qmail@qis> References: <20010824023928.3168.qmail@qis> <10297.998637309@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <10297.998637309@redhat.com> From: "Nikolai Vladychevski" To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mtdchar major , 90 or 91? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:18:54 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: David Woodhouse writes: > > niko@isl.net.mx said: >> Why in MAKEDEV the char device has major 90 and in mtdchar.c it has >> redefined from 90 to 91 in one of the first lines of code: > > Eep, sorry. That was a local hack which shouldn't have escaped my tree. > Reverted. > that's what I tought, last question, do you think I can use the lastest cvs for production, or I should stay on 20000704..... (It's just I wanted to use Ollie Who's new DoC millenium driver and be up to date.....) Nikolai