From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [62.235.237.200] (helo=portablue.intern.mind.be) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16bPQ0-0004R5-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:11:36 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:22:40 +0100 To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com Subject: Re: JFFS2 & NAND Message-ID: <20020214172240.GA16142@mind.be> References: <02021416570005.29375@thomas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02021416570005.29375@thomas> From: p2@mind.be (Peter De Schrijver) Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 04:57:00PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Since the discussion is broken and I'm answering my question to myself for a > few days, I ask me, if the interest on this problem is gone. > No, certainly not. Unfortunately I don't have any hardware available now to test on. As soon as I have, I will certainly test JFFS2 on NAND and help fixing bugs. > I have spent a lot of time to make this running. It does, except one > unresolved issue, when we fail in flush_wbuf and wbuf contains more than the > actual node. > I'm willing to solve this too, but as I mentioned before, my knowlegde of > JFFS2 is not deep enough yet. Is there anybody, who want's to implement this > basicly or give me at least some pointers how to do it. > Peter.