From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pd9e41b01.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.228.27.1] helo=thomas.tec.autronix.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1756Zx-0004gF-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 16:08:38 +0100 Message-Id: <200205071513.g47FDpn06147@thomas.tec.autronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: gleixner@autronix.de To: David Woodhouse , Jarkko Lavinen Subject: Re: Benchmarking JFFS2 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:13:51 +0200 Cc: MTD List , jffs-dev@axis.com References: <20020506151930.A15109@kosh.hut.fi> <28528.1020448474@redhat.com> <25024.1020783726@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <25024.1020783726@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tuesday, 7. May 2002 17:02, David Woodhouse wrote: > jlavi@iki.fi said: > > I have caught the message 8 times. It doesn't occur rather seldom > > when I have been benchmarking JFFS2 over the weekend. > > > > On five cases the first line was "Unknown INCOMPAT nodetype C002 at > > 0020293C" (address varies). > > Er, this means it's marked as obsolete on the flash but not in memory. I > have a vague recollection of having seen this and worked out the cause. > Is this with the latest code from the jffs2-2_4-branch of CVS? Does it also > happen with the trunk code? Yep, this happens with the trunk code too. As I can remember, it happend, when I removed a directory and had a power loss before everything was written to flash. On the next mount I got some errors and was not able to remove the remains of this directory. -- Thomas ___________________________________ autronix automation GmbH http://www.autronix.de gleixner@autronix.de