From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105] helo=ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17LL4G-0000tW-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:51:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20020621095028.20837.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "xyz xyz" To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:50:28 +0800 Subject: X11 or microwindows on a DOC using GRUB?? Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: hi all, i m working on a thin client solution with a DOC-2000 chip of 16 MB now for RDP client to run ,we need an X client, ihave tried microwindows as well as X11(stripped down/ reduced X11) no doubt X11 take more space but somehow gives better performance now we need to develop some configurator modules and an user interface on our X client,so the problem is shall i go ahead with development for X11 or microwindows? the dilemma is bcoz of the fact that X11 client is providing a better resolution as compared to microwindows,but i feel for an embedded device microwindows is the rite choice,(as far as size is concerned ,with microwindows we are savin lot of space but anyway we r not using that space,it will b free) so i want to ask if someone has used microwindows in commercial apps,what are the drawbacks of using X11 on an embedded device and is micrwindows stable and good enough to b used in a comm apps(i have seen there r some black patches left when an app is closed in microwindows) has any1 faced problems like black patches(the screen needs to b refreshed manually) or any other display probs while runnin nano-X with framebuffer support. TIA -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze