Re: mkfs.jffs2.c rework (doh)

Re: mkfs.jffs2.c rework (doh)

[johan.adolfsson]

Doh..
Should have mentioned that the diff is against the old version,
but at least you get the picture.

/Johan


----- Original Message -----
From: <Johan.Adolfsson@axis.com>
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>; <andersen@codepoet.org>
Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Sent: den 25 november 2002 14:50
Subject: Re: mkfs.jffs2.c rework


> >
> > Also, could we have an option to write cleanmarkers to the beginning of
> > each block?
> >
> > --
> > dwmw2
>
> Here is a patch to add cleanmarkers and some minor bugfix:
> Here is what I would use as a comment:
> --
> Added support for adding cleanmarkers to start of every eraseblock.
> --no-cleanmarkers disables it.
> --cleanmarker=SIZE changes the cleanmarker size.
>
> Clean up hardcoded 16 to sizeof(ffbuf).
> Added missing pad_block_if_less_than() in output_reg().
> --
> Please apply if it looks ok.
> /Johan
>
>

Re: mkfs.jffs2.c rework (doh)

[Erik Andersen]

On Mon Nov 25, 2002 at 02:57:36PM +0100, johan.adolfsson@axis.com wrote:
> Doh..
> Should have mentioned that the diff is against the old version,
> but at least you get the picture.

Yup, I noticed.  It'll be easy enough to pull that into the
new version.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--