From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242] ident=root) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19M0HY-0001nh-NY for ; Sat, 31 May 2003 07:56:01 +0100 Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 23:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20030530.235505.23020750.davem@redhat.com> To: joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030531064851.GA20822@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20030530174319.GA16687@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20030530.171410.104043496.davem@redhat.com> <20030531064851.GA20822@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: matsunaga_kazuhisa@yahoo.co.jp cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org cc: dwmw2@infradead.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: jmorris@intercode.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 1/2 central workspace for zlib List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: J=F6rn Engel Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 08:48:51 +0200 > No locking needed whatsoever. I hope it can work :-) = How about preemption? zlib operations take their time, so at least = on up, it makes sense to preempt them, when not in softirq context. Ca= n this still be done lockless? You'll need to disable preemption.