From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200] helo=devserv.devel.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19Ul8W-0007Tc-0C for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:34:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:35:07 -0400 From: Alexander Viro To: David Woodhouse Message-ID: <20030624063507.E9043@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20030622225659.00a46a30@192.168.1.10> <1056446261.29264.393.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1056446261.29264.393.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:17:42AM +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Allen Curtis cc: Infradead Org cc: jffs-dev@axis.com Subject: Re: JFFS patch List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:17:42AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 06:58, Allen Curtis wrote: > > Patch for updating JFFS in 2.4.20 kernel > > Looks good. Want to take over maintenance for JFFS? I'm getting very > tempted to remove it from the 2.5 tree unless someone steps forward to > look after it. It would be nice. There are several ugly craps in there and I'd rather see it gone than try and fix them...