From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [145.253.187.130] (helo=proxy.baslerweb.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1A9lBu-0002Np-Jl for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:55:50 +0100 From: Thomas Koeller To: Dinesh Kumar Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:58:26 +0200 References: <20031015115257.16327.qmail@web8006.mail.in.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20031015115257.16327.qmail@web8006.mail.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310151458.26409.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ECOS] Stress testing JFFS2 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dinesh Kumar wrote: > I am newbie to JFFS2. What is the reason behind not > freeing jffs2_raw_node_ref from RAM (even after they > have been used)? Their purpose is to represent physical nodes in the FLASH, and so they must remain just as long as those. tk -------------------------------------------------- Thomas Koeller, Software Development Basler Vision Technologies An der Strusbek 60-62 22926 Ahrensburg Germany Tel +49 (4102) 463-162 Fax +49 (4102) 463-239 mailto:thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com http://www.baslerweb.com ==============================