From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [203.81.30.150] (helo=roxus.net) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1AeqpW-0002Za-Ni for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:13:15 +0000 Received: from roxus.net (roxus.net [127.0.0.1]) by roxus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0977NQ09083 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:07:25 +0800 From: "luoxiao" To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:07:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20040109150723.M52805@roxus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Subject: best nand flash fs for 2.0.38 kernel? Reply-To: luoxiao@roxus.net List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, all I'm currently trying to add nand flash file system support for the linux 2.0.38 porting on my company's product. I choosed the JFFS but the JFFS2 because it fits the old 2.0.x kernel. In the processing of porting I met a lot of troubles and I thought some of them are caused by bugs of JFFS code rather by my porting. So a question is: is the JFFS stable enough for product usage? I saw it is still in the fs/ directory of the brand-new 2.6.0 kernel. Does this fact mean that the version of JFFS in the 2.6.0 kernel is stable enough to use? I've searched the docs and mail archive but it seems that no one is using JFFS now. So the question is: what is the best nand flash file system for the 2.0.x kernel? Any hints are appreciated, thanks! Xiao Luo Operating System Dept. Roxus Tech.