public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* large page NAND
@ 2004-03-18 13:57 David Updegraff
  2004-03-18 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2004-03-18 14:15 ` David Woodhouse
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Updegraff @ 2004-03-18 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd

Hi.

There was a post or two a few months ago about support for larger 
(1,2,?,K) pagesize and the extra 2 bytes of config available in newer 
NAND chips..  And a cautionary about asking for advice before 
proceeding. Is there followup/progress on that front that I have missed? 
We are looking into these needs for some Samsung 2k-page NANDs.

Advice & recommended directions appreciated.

-dbu.
Dave Updegraff / Cray, Inc.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: large page NAND
  2004-03-18 13:57 large page NAND David Updegraff
@ 2004-03-18 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2004-03-18 14:15 ` David Woodhouse
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2004-03-18 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Updegraff, linux-mtd

On Thursday 18 March 2004 14:57, David Updegraff wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There was a post or two a few months ago about support for larger
> (1,2,?,K) pagesize and the extra 2 bytes of config available in newer
> NAND chips..  And a cautionary about asking for advice before
> proceeding. Is there followup/progress on that front that I have missed?
> We are looking into these needs for some Samsung 2k-page NANDs.
>
> Advice & recommended directions appreciated.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-March/009442.html

-- 
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
http://www.linutronix.de
mail: tglx@linutronix.de

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: large page NAND
  2004-03-18 13:57 large page NAND David Updegraff
  2004-03-18 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2004-03-18 14:15 ` David Woodhouse
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2004-03-18 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Updegraff; +Cc: linux-mtd

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 07:57 -0600, David Updegraff wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> There was a post or two a few months ago about support for larger 
> (1,2,?,K) pagesize and the extra 2 bytes of config available in newer 
> NAND chips..  And a cautionary about asking for advice before 
> proceeding. Is there followup/progress on that front that I have missed? 
> We are looking into these needs for some Samsung 2k-page NANDs.

Thomas and I haven't been forced to deal with these flashes and hence
haven't given it much thought. Nobody else seems to be hugely prolific.

> Advice & recommended directions appreciated.

Try it. The existing code shouldn't be _too_ hard to adjust. Join #mtd
on irc.freenode.net and heckle Thomas and I about how you want the
generic NAND interfaces changed.

-- 
dwmw2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-18 14:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-18 13:57 large page NAND David Updegraff
2004-03-18 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-03-18 14:15 ` David Woodhouse

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox