From: Ben Dooks <ben-mtd@fluff.org>
To: "lp4u@inwind.it" <lp4u@inwind.it>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, gavin@simtec.co.uk
Subject: Re: NAND detect
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040922202907.GA25491@home.fluff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <I4G9K8$32150B19D33A6F23F04032D520B4890A@libero.it>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 05:55:20PM +0200, lp4u@inwind.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a s3c2410 board (BAST architecture).
> I have installed on board a kernel2.4.26 patched and with MTD.
> But the board, at boot, don't detect the NAND (I've 3 NANDs on board: 2 samsung & 1 STM).
Does the bootloader list them, newish versions of the bootloader
should probe all available devices and print the ID information
it finds as it goes.
> The MTD detect only NOR Flash.
I've just had a check through, and it seems the driver was
written pre the nand hooks for >1 chip per controller, and
therefore just selects slot 0 (smartmedia card) at start time.
A quick way to get going would be to change the value passed
to bast_nand_select_slot() in bast_nand_init() in the driver
to at least show that a chip can be detected and used. The
current default in the driver is to select the SmartMedia socket.
The slots are allocated as 0 for the SmartMedia card slot, and
1 through 3 for the chips on the board (U52, U53 and U54)
Looking through the NAND code, it seems that we may have a
few problems with implementing >1 chip, which could bite
in your configuration:
1) The driver needs to work out which slots are used and
create a linear mapping of chips -> slots.
2) The NAND layer itself seems to concatenate the chips
together, not export them as seperate devices, which
makes supporting removable devices in the card slot
and on-board NAND difficult.
I would be interesting in anyone's comments about how difficult
it would be to have an overall controller activity lock and
allow a single controller to register more than one NAND chip
as a seperate device.
It would also be nice to have at least some form of hotplug
mechanism support where a chip can be re-scanned after a
change in it's detect status.
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-22 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 15:55 NAND detect lp4u
2004-09-22 20:29 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2004-09-23 7:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-09-23 9:48 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <20040923191506.GE25491@home.fluff.org>
2004-09-23 23:05 ` Ben Dooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-23 9:54 lp4u
2004-09-23 10:53 ` Ben Dooks
2004-09-28 10:17 Nand detect lp4u
2004-09-28 10:55 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040922202907.GA25491@home.fluff.org \
--to=ben-mtd@fluff.org \
--cc=ben@fluff.org.uk \
--cc=gavin@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lp4u@inwind.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox