From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6] helo=mail.osdl.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CUM9X-0005KP-Dh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 04:31:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:30:42 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Woodhouse Message-Id: <20041117013042.6bc0579d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1100683325.9201.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20041117085555.GA22829@synertronixx3> <20041117092127.GB2201@synertronixx3> <1100683325.9201.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2 Oops on 2.6.10-rc1-mm5 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:21 +0100, Konstantin Kletschke wrote: > > Am 2004-11-17 09:07 +0000 schrieb Artem B. Bityuckiy: > > > > > I don't know what version of MTD is in you kernel, I would advice you to > > > try the lastest MTD snapshot first. > > > > Me neither, simply the stuff which is in 2.6.10-rc1-mm5. > > Well I think Andrew Morton does not patch mtd stuff in there... > > I believe he does when I've got stuff in bk://linux-mtd.bkbits.net/mtd-2.6 > for him to put there. Which means there'll probably be MTD stuff in his > next offering, since Linus only took the 'strictly bugfixes only' tree > out of the two I offered him last night. yup, I currently have a 99k mtd patch. -mm kernels always contain whatever was in those 32 bk trees a few hours before -mm release.