From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.198] helo=moskovskaya.fh-wedel.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CfhE7-0003dt-RC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:14:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:14:37 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: David Vrabel Message-ID: <20041218161437.GC1083@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <41C2C416.5090602@arcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <41C2C416.5090602@arcom.com> Cc: Linux MTD mailing list , Joakim Tjernlund Subject: Re: JFFS3 & performance List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 17 December 2004 11:33:42 +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > > (Also, I wouldn't have thought crc16 on 32 bit archs would have any > significant performance benefits. But since I don't know either the > crc16 or crc32 algorithms... *shrug*) See my earlier posts in this thread for the algorithms. Without special optimizations, you can process 16 bits at a time for crc16 and 0 (zero) bits at a time for crc32. Jörn -- People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first. -- unknown